White Women, Come Get Your People
As of the end of Part 4, we've discussed how the "sides" of the conflict for which white women can be "gender traitors" is at least applicable to the "Demographic War", where because white women marry and have children with white men, and those white men "cherish and revere" their wives and work towards a "mutual benefit", white women have sold out their loyalty to colored women who are trying to achieve the exact same thing but aren't as successful despite the "white race" being only about 16% of the world population.
Because of this, white women should stop marrying white men and having white babies because that supports the patriarchy that is denying "basic rights" in exchange for food, shelter, and companionship. Also, telling your daughters to dress modestly supports the patriarchy as well.
Now, instead of waging war for their own "side", the author has instead sough to discourage is dismantle the ability for "the patriarchy" to "fight back" through having children. The first method was to make even the desire to see your specific race continue to exist racist, a sign of racial supremacy, despite every other race holding the same exact priorities.
The article continues in this vein.
Recently, Ms. Conway even weaponized her own alleged sexual assault in service to her boss by discouraging women from feeling empathy with Christine Blasey Ford or anger at Judge Kavanaugh.
Ms. Conway knows that a woman who steps out of line may be ridiculed by the president himself. President Trump mocked Dr. Blasey in front of a cheering crowd on Tuesday evening. Betray the patriarchy and your whiteness won’t save you.
The pedestal is a superior, if precarious, place. For white women, it’s apparently better than being “stronger together,” with the 94 percent of black women and 86 percent of Latinas who voted for Hillary Clinton.
A white woman who tells a truth that interrupts the story, which may or may not be true, from being believed and acted upon, is "weaponizing" her own experiences in favor of "the patriarchy".
A white woman who knows that there are consequences for lying and deceit which go beyond skin color, and trying to explain that the legal system doesn't care about your race is anything but helpful.
A white woman decided not to go along with the colored women who voted for Hillary because she also had a vagina and promised them free resources instead of the patriarchal white guy who didn't have a vagina and wanted to empower people to break the cycle of victimization instead of just getting free stuff without having to work for it.
How does this relate to the "Demographic War"? Well, remember, the losers don't want to stop losing, so they have to get the "winners" to not want to "win". What do I mean by that?
White women don't have as many abortions as black or Hispanic women, at least according to this chart. When looked at as a nation though, white women account for 51% of the abortions obtained legally. Why the disparity between the different sources of data? Because there are more white women to begin with, so while a lower % rate of white women get abortions, because there are more of them in the country, the raw number of abortions will be higher.
The "problem" though is that the number simply isn't high enough to make a big shift in the demographics, and so white women still hold more political power than colored women, even if the entirety of colored women all vote the same way, and even the author earlier noted that only 53% of white women voted for Trump.
So the only way for the colored women to achieve their political priorities that are in conflict with the "gender traitors" is to get more white women to vote the way they do, or to remove white men and women from the political process altogether, and the least bloody way to do that is by having fewer of them want to continue existing or to have children.
Look at the articles encouraging childlessness. Look at the suicide rates. None of it is an accident.
Especially with the author who, as I've said before, hasn't been able to participate in the "War" for "her side", if she can at least discourage folks on the "other side", or perhaps recruit them to "her side", then she'll have done her part in contributing to the "war effort".
Let's continue with the article just a bit more for this part.
During the 2016 presidential election, did white women really vote with their whiteness in mind? Lorrie Frasure-Yokley, a political scientist at U.C.L.A., recently measured the effect of racial identity on white women’s willingness to support Trump in 2016 and found a positive and statistically significant relationship. So white women who voted for him did so to prop up their whiteness.
Notice how every study cited by the article so far was conducted by a woman?
Notice how the only reason the 53% of women who voted for Trumop could have done so was to "prop up their whiteness"? That no other reason is worth mentioning or is valid for the discussion at hand, and that correlation is said to be the same as causation?
That because there is a positive relationship between identity and voting, there is a causal effect, and it only exists for white people? That nobody else is voting based on identity, whether racial, sexual, or gender-based, it's only the white women who are doing it and when they do it it's wrong?
In the theme of "disarm your enemy", it's quite the clever trick to say someone else is somehow wrong for doing something that you are also doing, and then find some external variable you can pin it on to pretend like you aren't being a hypocrite.
In Part 6, we'll delve into other findings from that study that the author finds equally reprehensible and you aren't supposed to ask what the implications of such things being reprehensible are.
No comments:
Post a Comment