This is a continuation of Part 5, looking at an opinion piece published by the NYT.
White Women, Come Get Your People
In Part 5 we see how, in response to the phrase "lead, follow, or get out of the way", colored women are upset because white women didn't follow or get out of the way, but instead voted without considering how the rest of "the sisterhood" would be affected, selfishly choosing both politicians and sexual partners that were also white so that they could "monopolize resources" instead of being "good women" and doing their part to help colored women in the "Demographic War" against white people and the patriarchal systems that they create.
I said that there were some more scandalous discoveries in the study beyond the fact that white women may vote based on what looks to be a better deal white women than for all of women, and the article doesn't disappoint.
In the study, white women who agreed that “many women interpret innocent remarks or acts as sexist” were 17 percent more likely to vote for a Republican candidate. They were also likely to agree that “blacks should work their way up without special favors.” To be sure, women of color aren’t inherently less sexist or even without their own racial biases. But unlike white women, they can’t use race privilege to their advantage.
White woman who thought that other women overreacted to innocent statements were 17% more likely to vote for a Republican candidate who probably didn't campaign on promising perpetual victims that the government will, by force, right all the wrongs in the world and bring justice to all wrongs, whether real or imagined. What a complete shocker.
White women who worked hard to achieve their position in life don't think that, simply because someone belongs to a different race, members of those other races should be able to circumvent the hard work and skip straight to enjoying the fruits of hard labor.
The "race privilege" is simply that because white women are white, men who are also white are likely to favor white women, and since white men are both the most powerful entities in the world, and the greatest evil, when white women do something that white men approve of, it must also have been evil and so white women should never do anything that white men would approve of otherwise they'll be "gender traitors", betraying colored women in the "Demographic War".
If you think that is complex, that's on purpose, because in greater complexity it is easier to hide the raw and unvarnished truths which, if actually seen and understood, would make all the whining and crying appear just like the childish tantrum it really is.
White women have "racial privilege" because white men want white women and white children, instead of colored women and mixed-race children. Because white men want to have white kids, they're racist, and white women helping them out with that are traitors. Identity politics, all the way down.
The article continues.
This blood pact between white men and white women is at issue in the
November midterms. President Trump knows it, and at that Tuesday news
conference, he signaled to white women to hold the line: “The people
that have complained to me about it the most about what’s happening are
women. Women are very angry,” he said. “I have men that don’t like it,
but I have women that are incensed at what’s going on.”
White women are waking up to the fact that colored women don't want them to have anything they can't have, which on a global scale, includes running water and consistent access to food. When people immigrate and do not assimilate, they simply recreate what they left behind where they now live. Instead of being called an invasion, this was called "diversity and inclusion", touted as being "good for the country".
Think about that. It's good for the country that people move into the country who do not like what the country is and want to recreate pockets of the countries they were escaping or leaving behind. This is not that much different than saying cancer is good for you because, despite the cancer being different, embracing diversity is more important!
When pockets of immigrants vote as a group based on their interests, that isn't racist, but when 53% of white women vote based on their interests, that's racist.
In addition, white women were waking up to the fact that colored men had no interest in "cherishing and revering" them, or working to their "mutual benefit". The statistics out of the minority communities show that when women are dominant, colored men don't keep working towards a "mutual benefit", but will instead seek to maximize their own interests at the cost of their partners and their offspring.
Not only was that the case, but colored women were touting the "new system" where men were little more than disposable whores kept around for entertainment and slave labor while women "got to" take on all the responsibilities of men, and the government would happily then take over for all the responsibilities of the woman and raise any children she decided to let live, because the government would also happily kill off any accidental or unwanted pregnancies without any questions asked.
I mean, put like this, it should be a little startling that it was only 53% of white women, but I digress.
White women saw what was at stake, and decided that it wasn't worth giving up everything so that other women could have something they didn't deserve, and now all the women who sought to gain everything the white women had are upset because now they won't get something they didn't deserve.
Like a husband, a family, and resources and being "cherished and revered".
Remember, the author is saying the problem lies with the women who aren't giving up what they have, not with those who won't try to obtain it for themselves legitimately.
There's not much left of the article but we'll pick it up again in Part 7.
No comments:
Post a Comment